Quality KPIs under ISO 9001 clause 9.1: the standard names none of them
ISO 9001 clause 9.1 names no single KPI. What it does require — what to monitor, when to analyse, how to evaluate — and how to pick indicators that hold up.
Read article →5-Why often stops at “operator was not paying attention”, and an 8D report becomes the form a customer insists on. Neither is a flaw in the method; both are flaws in how it is applied. These articles show how far a causal chain has to run before a corrective action can bite, how the VDA structure separates the occurrence chain from the detection chain, and why verification of effectiveness is the step most often missing in practice.
ISO 9001 clause 9.1 names no single KPI. What it does require — what to monitor, when to analyse, how to evaluate — and how to pick indicators that hold up.
Read article →How to build a 5 Whys chain that holds up, with Ohno's original example and three worked cases — and when the method is not enough.
Read article →The eight disciplines on one example, the two D4 cause chains, the mapping to ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 — and which OEMs actually require 8D.
Read article →From audit finding to evidence that the fix worked: classification, cause, corrective action and the effectiveness review ISO 9001 10.2.1 d) requires.
Read article →ISO 9001 never uses the term CAPA. What clause 10.2 requires instead — correction, cause, corrective action, effectiveness review — and where processes break.
Read article →